Sunday, March 29, 2009

D.C., nearly half my life later, is evidence I've changed

The last time I was in Washington, D.C., I was 14-years-old on my 8th grade class trip. It was the first time I had ever been on an airplane, but also the first time I'd ever been out of the Deep South in my life. I toured the monuments and museums and spent a day in colonial Williamsburg, Va., and it was the first time I remember realizing that there was life outside of the world I knew (I think Junior High was also the time I realized Mardi Gras is not a national holiday).

Now at 25 -- after studying abroad in Europe, traveling around the U.S., graduating college and living in the Midwest for the past six months -- I saw the city in a different way. I wasn't just on a tour bus clicking away on a disposable camera; I felt the ebb and flow of the city's character the way I do when I now walk through different parts of other cities with so much personality. The monuments were not just a pile of stone, the museums not a storage closet of old things.



D.C. is the epicenter of our country's history in that it houses many of our most valued documents and artifacts -- The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution. The museums are open history books, each exhibit a different page. I walked through the Museum of Natural History and The Holocaust museum, and I passed by the Iwo Jima Memorial and the Washington monument in awe and respect.

By far one of the best museums I've ever been to was the Newseum, the year-old home of the history of journalism. Not even four hours was enough to see everything on its six floors of video, photos, artifacts and papers, but it was worth every minute. I don't remember ever being so moved by being surrounded by history. In case you need a reminder of what journalists have accomplished over centuries of disseminating information and their imperative presence in the world, spend a few hours looking at old newspapers, typewriters, photos and videos of reporters in action.

But the true highlight of my trip was being blessed with good company. My friends took time out of their lives to visit with and host me, and my time with them reinforces that doing nearly anything in good company is worth doing. D.C. is a great city, but she's lucky to have her invaluable new residents.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Isn't landing the 2016 Olympics in Chicago supposed to be a big deal? Not to the city's dailies..

With Chicago being one of the four remaining candidates to host the 2016 Olympics, you'd think that Chicago's major daily newspapers would be on top of events relating to the Olympics. Guess again.

The U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) announced that due to the bad economy they are making a 15 percent cut in their workforce to save $7.1 million. The International Herald Tribune also reported that USOC still plans to endorse Chicago for the 2016 summer games.

Since this news could have a huge impact on Chicago's bid, why aren't the Sun-Times or Tribune reporting this story?

There are Associated Press reports from the International Herald Tribune, The Guardian (UK), and ESPN, but there is nothing on either Chicago newspapers' site -- not on the local, national or world news pages at all.

Chicagogames.com, which is run through the Chicago Tribune, had a post today linking to the ESPN report, but this story wasn't posted anywhere on chicagotribune.com, and there isn't even a link to chicagogames.com in the Tribune's list of blogs.

With taxpayers worried about footing the bill and concerns of how Bronzeville residents will be affected with the Olympic village, shouldn't the Tribune and Sun-Times at least be posting the AP reports of the USOC budget cuts?

I hope to see the dailies break down what this means for Chicago in the next day or so, but if they don't feel mentioning it is even important, I wouldn't count on it.

Read my classmates' responses to this post on newsnow.ning.com.